(short description of image)APPEAL no. 26

(short description of image)
Appeals Committee
Chairman (short description of image)Steen Møller DEN
Members (short description of image)Naki Bruni
(short description of image)David Stevenson
(short description of image)Herman De Wael
ITA
GBR
BEL

Scribe (short description of image)Herman De Wael BEL

(short description of image)
Event
1998 World Championships
Open Pairs Semifinal
   
(short description of image)
Countries
Argentina v USA
   
(short description of image)
Players
NS (short description of image)Poleschi (short description of image)Alujas
EW (short description of image)Wildavsky (short description of image)Morse
   
(short description of image)
Board
Board 21. Dealer North. NS Game
ª Q J 6
© K 10
¨ A K 10 7 6 4
§ J 10
ª A 10 9 5 4 (short description of image) ª K 8 7 3
© 7 5 2 © Q 4 3
¨ J 5 ¨ 8 3
§ 7 3 2 § K 9 8 5
ª 2
© A J 9 8 6
¨ Q 9 2
§ A Q 6 4

West
North
East
South

1©
Pass 1ª¹ Pass 2§²
Pass 3NT All Pass

¹ Relay (nothing about Spades)
² N/E: 5©+4§/¨ OR 5©332 S/W: 5©+4§/¨ OR 5©332ª
   
(short description of image)
Result
3NT+4: +520
   
(short description of image)
Facts
The explanation that East received about the bid of 2§ did not conform to the true meaning of the call, which was the one explained by South to East. East claims he might have led Spades in stead of Clubs with the correct information.
   
(short description of image)
TD's
Decision
Misinformation, No Damage, Score Stands.

(short description of image)
Appellants
E/W
   
(short description of image)
Players'
Comments
North/South did not attend the Committee meeting, and neither did West, as the only problem was with East's lead. East stated that had he received the correct information, his chances of finding the more successful Spade lead were greater.

(short description of image)
Committee's
Comments
The Committee decided that the explanation that East received was consistent with nine possible distributions in South: 3541, 2542, 1543, 3514, 2524, 1534, 2533, 3523, 3532. In five of these, there are more clubs than spades in dummy. In two, the number of spades and clubs is equal, and in two, there are more spades than clubs. In any case four spades is impossible, while four clubs is. With the correct explanation, seven distributions remain: 5 with more Clubs, 1 equal, and 1 with more Spades. Although the relative frequency of each of these distributions is not absolutely equal, the Committee felt that the Spade lead stood out nevertheless. The Committee felt the player had tried to play the board three times, once at the table, once before the Director, and a third time before the Committee. While it is perfectly normal for him to call upon the Director if he feels damaged, a higher standard is needed before the Committee. The Director had given a well thought through ruling and by Appealing, the player had only proved a lack of faith in the Director. The Appeals' Committee at World Championships does not act as a safety net for bad Directors, especially when these Directors prove time and again their quality. For this reason the Committee felt the Appeal lacked merit.
   
(short description of image)
Committee's
Decision
Decision upheld, Score stands.
   
(short description of image)
Relevant
Laws
   
(short description of image)
Deposit
Returned  
Forfeited X


(short description of image) Return to Top of page To main Championship page(short description of image)