(short description of image)APPEAL no. 5

(short description of image)
Appeals Committee
Chairman (short description of image)Richard Colker USA
Members (short description of image)Becky Rogers
(short description of image)Eric Kokish
(short description of image)Patrick Choy
(short description of image)Tommy Sandsmark
USA
CAN
SIP
NOR

Scribe (short description of image)Tommy Sandsmark NOR

(short description of image)
Event
1998 World Championships
Mixed Pairs Qualifying
   
(short description of image)
Countries
GBR - Austria v France
   
(short description of image)
Players
NS (short description of image)Wright Cormack
EW (short description of image) Lustin Kaplan
   
(short description of image)
Board
Board 10. Dealer East. Game All
ª 6 5 2
© Q
¨ A 8 6
§ A 10 8 4 3 2
ª A K 9 8 4 (short description of image) ª Q
© 10 8 7 6 5 2 © K J 9
¨ Q 2 ¨ K J 10 5 4
§ § K Q 6 5
ª J 10 7 3
© A 4 3
¨ 9 7 3
§ J 9 7

West
North
East
South

1NT Pass
4¨ Pass 4© All Pass
   
(short description of image)
Result
4©+1: -650
   
(short description of image)
Facts
The TD was called to the table after the end of play. The play went: ©3 to the queen and king, ©J to the ace, ©4 to the 9, ªQ and at that point there was some confusion as to the succession of events. East did something with her cards as she either played a diamond to dummy's queen or said she would play a diamond, losing only to the ace. South told her partner (when he put his cards back into the board) that if he didn't take the ¨A immediateliy, she would get a spade trick. N/S stated that North had played the ¨A AFTER East's claim; E/W said that North played the ¨A BEFORE East claimed by saying 'A diamond for you!'
   
(short description of image)
TD's
Decision
Score stands

(short description of image)
Appellants
N/S
   
(short description of image)
Players'
Comments
North said that he never actually put the ¨A down on the table. He maintained that East said she would play a diamond to the queen, but that she didn't actually do it. At this point North acquiesced, assuming that declarer had another spade for her 1NT opening. North also said that declarer might have made a proper claim after trick three, without cashing the ªQ. East spoke only French. With her partner as interpreter she denied having said 'A diamond for you and the rest are mine'. Both East and West insisted that a diamond was played and taken with the ace.

(short description of image)
Committee's
Comments
The Committee found that what had really been going on was that East had probably played a diamond to the queen, then shown her hand to her screenmate to shorten the play. North had quite correctly understood this action as a claim, to which he acquiesced. The Committee did not think that North had actually put the ¨A on the table, but even if it had been played, the claim had come first. When there is a claim, the laws require play to stop, and the TD is to be called if the claim is contested. It is within South's rights to contest any claim, as North may not concede any tricks on her behalf. Thus, the Committee found that N/S were entitled to one more trick, as the claim came after East had removed her last entry to her diamonds with her play of ªQ.
   
(short description of image)
Committee's
Decision
The contract was adjusted to 4© by East making 10 tricks, 620 to E/W.
   
(short description of image)
Relevant
Laws
   
(short description of image)
Deposit
Returned X
Forfeited  


(short description of image) Return to Top of page To main Championship page(short description of image)